The way to make the font of standalone graphics with pgfplots the same as the beamertheme in use for example moloch or metropolis
behaves being a modal verb, so that questions and negatives are formed without the auxiliary verb do, as in it used to not be like that
behaves being a modal verb, so that questions and negatives are formed without the auxiliary verb do, as in:
You should use both equally. Oxforddictionaries.com votes for "Did he use to" whereas other resources contain "Did he used to "
is compactness about the goal space necessary for existence for extending continual function from dense subspace?
RobustoRobusto 153k4141 gold badges370370 silver badges616616 bronze badges Incorporate a remark
when the two choices are applicable in its place. "I would like cake and/or pie" implies "I would like one or both equally of the following: cake; pie."
Context can serve the purpose of saying "but not the two". Should your Mother says "you may get the jawbreaker or even the bubblegum", you already know that she (correctly) won't let you have each. However, if she intends to Permit you to have each, even when context suggests if not, she will say:
– Cerberus - Reinstate Monica Commented Jun 16, 2011 at 19:26 4 The correct way of claiming this sentence is /ay'ustəbiyə'hɪtnæn/. The important part is that "used to" has to be pronounced /yustə/, with an /st/, not a /zd/. This can be true for the previous terminative idiom On this example, as well as for your different idiom be used to, meaning 'be accustomed to', as within the second clause in I used to have difficulty sleeping, but now I'm used towards the train whistles in the evening.
For this reason indicating "I don't Assume that is a problem" is fine - as long as you're common with this particular usage on the phrase "that". Otherwise, then it could clearly bring about confusion.
Amongst the uncomplicated-to-use reference books I personal, none will come up with a satisfactory explanation, but – as is frequently the case – Michael Swan's Sensible English Use
You will need to log in to answer this question. Start asking to receive solutions
If I wanted to generally be completely unambiguous, I'd say a thing like "need to be delivered prior to ...". On the opposite hand, sometimes the ambiguity is irrelevant, despite which convention governed it, if a bottle of milk stated "Best f used by August 10th", you couldn't get me to drink it on that date. TL;DR: It really is ambiguous.
Now we attempt our nifty trick of dropping one of the "that"s — "I do not Imagine that problem is critical" —, and we quickly get a specific amount of people that parse the sentence as "[I do not more info Consider that] [problem is severe]" on their own 1st consider, and get terribly confused, and have to go back and try a different parsing. (Is that a backyard-path sentence but?)